Anonymous user
World University Law School: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 318:
===Select Databases===
Cornell University Legal Information Institute (LII). 2013. [http://www.law.cornell.edu/ Legal Information Institute]. (We are a not-for-profit group that believes everyone should be able to read and understand the laws that govern them, without cost. We carry out this vision by: Publishing law online, for free. Creating materials that help people understand law. Exploring new technologies that make it easier for people to find the law.). Ithaca, NY: law.cornell.edu.
Cornell University Online Legal Resources. 2013. [http://guides.library.cornell.edu/content.php?pid=346409&sid=2888938 Online Legal Resources]. (Links to Cornell Law Library's subscription databases as well as selected subscription databases provided by Cornell University Library and selected free resources). Ithaca, NY: guides.library.cornell.edu.
Line 497:
Zittrain, Jonathan. 2011. [http://futureoftheinternet.org/sopa-compromise A SOPA compromise is floated]. December 7th. Cambrigde, MA: futureoftheinternet.org.
'''Law and China'''
Shenzhen Siruiman Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Kengzi Water Supply Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kangtailan Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. 2014. [http://cgc.law.stanford.edu/guiding-cases/guiding-case-20 Shenzhen Siruiman Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Kengzi Water Supply Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kangtailan Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd., An Invention Patent Infringement Dispute]. ("We are pleased to release the English translation of Guiding Case No. 20, the first Guiding Case on intellectual property: Shenzhen Siruiman Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Kengzi Water Supply Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kangtailan Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd., An Invention Patent Infringement Dispute (http://cgc.law.stanford.edu/guiding-cases/guiding-case-20). The Supreme People’s Court rendered the original judgment on December 20, 2011, revoking the first and second instance judgments rendered by the Intermediate People’s Court of Shenzhen Municipality, Guangdong Province, and the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province, respectively). Stanford, CA: Stanford Law School China Guiding Cases Project.
| |||