China: Difference between revisions

195 bytes added ,  10 years ago
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 166:
'''Law and China'''
 
Shenzhen Siruiman Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Kengzi Water Supply Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kangtailan Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. 2014. [http://cgc.law.stanford.edu/guiding-cases/guiding-case-20 Shenzhen Siruiman Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Kengzi Water Supply Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kangtailan Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd., An Invention Patent Infringement Dispute]. ("We are pleased to release the English translation of Guiding Case No. 20, the first Guiding Case on intellectual property: Shenzhen Siruiman Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Kengzi Water Supply Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Kangtailan Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd., An Invention Patent Infringement Dispute (http://cgc.law.stanford.edu/guiding-cases/guiding-case-20). The Supreme People’s Court rendered the original judgment on December 20, 2011, revoking the first and second instance judgments rendered by the Intermediate People’s Court of Shenzhen Municipality, Guangdong Province, and the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province, respectively). Stanford, CA: Stanford Law School China Guiding Cases Project.
 
Stanford Law School China Guiding Cases Project email lists:
 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/chinaguidingcasesproject
 
http://www.weibo.com/signup/signup.php?inviteCode=3275168270
 
 
Anonymous user